|
|
Thinking Inside the Box
Ventilation:
'Airing' on the Side of Caution
by Moses D. F.
Ling, PE, RA
This fall, I had the pleasure of attending a workshop at Woods
Hole Research Center. The workshop participants were architects
and graduate students involved in teaching environmental control
systems. The focus of the workshop was to conduct case studies
as a means to improve pedagogical delivery. By the second day,
participants were engaged in proving a number of hypotheses and
collecting data in this award winning building by William
McDonough + Partners.
My hypothesis was that offices on the top floor of a building
with an open core do not receive fresh air from the outside
through an open window. The building operator had shut off the
ventilation system assuming the occupants would open the windows
for fresh air. At the end, I concluded that natural ventilation
strategies need to be carefully considered in the design
process. When properly incorporated into the building design,
natural ventilation can be pleasing when the outdoor condition
is favorable. Consider the following points of interest:
- In a building where the culture promotes conservation,
people will take the stairs. As the result, doors in stair
enclosures will be propped open for convenience and create
chimneys for updrafts through the building. (Hold-open
devices are preferable to wood wedges if the enclosure is
rated.)
- Occupants, in general, do not open windows. They will
work in rooms with elevated carbon dioxide levels without
opening the windows.
- Researchers and educators of architecture, who should
know better, work in rooms with elevated carbon dioxide
levels without opening windows.
- Outdoor air is not as clean as one might expect. At this
pristine Cape Cod location, outside air carbon dioxide
levels were 500 ppm. The acceptable indoor threshold is 800
ppm. One might conclude that clean outdoor air potentially
is more than 50% “contaminated”.
- One occupant commented that the threat of rain causes
her to keep the window closed. Overhangs and awning windows
can allow windows to stay open during heavy downpours.
- Occupants loved the visual connection to the outdoors
through the windows. Perhaps the healthful effects are more
psychological than physiological.
Through a studious day-long data collecting effort and
blowing bubbles in the building, we concluded that air will exit
through open windows on the top floor. This implies that the
occupants in these top floor offices are receiving second hand
air from the core of the building.
At the other end of the design process are the code minimum
requirements. The International Mechanical Code mandates
placement of outside air inlets. If the natural ventilation
strategy is employed, operable windows become outside air
inlets.
- 401.5 Locate outside air exhaust and intakes openings
10’ from lot lines. If the opening fronts on a public way or
street, the distance is measured from the center line of the
public way.
- 401.5.1 (a) Locate outdoor air intakes 10’ from any
hazardous or noxious contaminants such as chimneys, plumbing
vents, street, alleys, parking lots and loading docks.
- 401.5.1 (b) Where a source of contaminant is located
within 10’ of the intake opening, the code mandates locating
the intake opening a minimum of 2’ below the contaminant
source. Careful consideration is recommended when invoking
this rule. Two feet is the code minimum, good design relies
on careful considerations by the designer. In the exhaust
section of the code, exhausts are prohibited from locations
where the discharge air can be readily drawn back into the
building.
While operable windows are desirable (and I love them at my
home), I don’t open them when it is hot, cold, or raining (now
that I live in a house with few overhangs). If the control of
the indoor environmental conditions is crucial, mechanically
introducing treated outside air is the preferable option. The
designers can centralize the intakes and locate the louvers
strategically. An economizer cycle can be specified to introduce
outside air directly when the conditions are favorable.

Moses D. F.
Ling is Principal of Ling Partnership, State College, Pennsylvania
and a faculty member in the Department of Architectural Engineering
of The Pennsylvania State University. The author would appreciate
any comments.
mling@lingpartnership.com
|
|